(Q2714)
Revision as of 09:32, 19 December 2019 by Podehaye (talk | contribs) (Changed claim: Property:P126: 17 january 1994, 92.c.130. Foundation De Ombudsman requested access on behalf of a patient at a hospital. The Registratiekamer explains that the Dutch registration law does not contain a right to author...)
Statements
0 references
See pp 18--19 and footnote 1
Dutch property law specifically states that civilians have the right to declarea representative to perform legal action on their behalf. (Burgerlijk Wetboek Boek 3 -BWBR0005291,1992)
Comparative laws for exercising legal action through intermediariescan be found in other EU countries, although some countries require the declarationto be notarized (Dine, Koutsias, & Blecher, 2007; The powers of attorney,2016).
The notarization of intermediarystatements is not required under Dutch law (Busch, H Hondius, J Van Kooten, N Schelhaas, &M Schrama, 2003).
0 references
17 january 1994, 92.c.130. Foundation De Ombudsman requested access on behalf of a patient at a hospital. The Registratiekamer explains that the Dutch registration law does not contain a right to authorisation, but general administrative law does, so in case of a request to a public organisation, a specific written authorisation can be valid.
0 references