Difference between revisions of "Youtubers Union transparency initiative (Q1831)"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Changed claim: has (P144): proposal (Q1837)) |
(Changed claim: has (P144): proposal (Q1837)) |
||
| Property / has: proposal / qualifier | |||
| + | comment: Let YouTubers contest decisions that have negative consequences | ||
Revision as of 12:36, 31 October 2019
No description defined
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English |
Youtubers Union transparency initiative
|
No description defined
|
Statements
Publish all categories and decision criteria that affect monetization and views of videos
Give clear explanations for individual decisions — for example, if a video is demonetized, which parts of the video violated which criteria in the Advertiser-Friendly Content Guidelines?
Give YouTubers a human contact person who is qualified and authorized to explain decisions that have negative consequences for YouTubers (and fix them if they are mistaken)
Let YouTubers contest decisions that have negative consequences
0 references