Difference between revisions of "Youtubers Union transparency initiative (Q1831)"

From Wikibase Personal data
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(‎Created claim: instance of (P3): activity (Q7))
 
(5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Property / see also
 +
Property / see also: Youtube P-Score / rank
 +
Normal rank
Property / part of
 +
Property / part of: future-of-work and data protection / rank
 +
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 09:19, 1 November 2019

Statements

0 references
0 references
Publish all categories and decision criteria that affect monetization and views of videos
0 references
Give clear explanations for individual decisions — for example, if a video is demonetized, which parts of the video violated which criteria in the Advertiser-Friendly Content Guidelines?
0 references
Let YouTubers contest decisions that have negative consequences
0 references
Let YouTubers contest decisions that have negative consequences
0 references
Create an independent mediation board for resolving disputes (here the Ombuds Office of the Crowdsourcing Code of Conduct can offer relevant lessons)
0 references
Formal participation of YouTubers in important decisions, for example through a YouTuber Advisory Board
0 references
0 references

Identifiers

0 references