Changes

: {{reply_to|Alexbfree}} yes, we should seek to extend this technique to have the expressivity you are seeking with the page [[Project:Vocabulary/GDPR]]. one comment though: you use {{Q|1117}} as a qualifier, but I think you mean a property, no? (also on [[Project:Vocabulary/GDPR]]). [[User:Podehaye|Podehaye]] ([[User talk:Podehaye|talk]]) 16:24, 11 February 2020 (UTC)

: {{reply_to|Alexbfree}} yes, we should seek to extend this technique to have the expressivity you are seeking with the page [[Project:Vocabulary/GDPR]]. one comment though: you use {{Q|1117}} as a qualifier, but I think you mean a property, no? (also on [[Project:Vocabulary/GDPR]]). [[User:Podehaye|Podehaye]] ([[User talk:Podehaye|talk]]) 16:24, 11 February 2020 (UTC)

:: {{reply_to|Podehaye}} erm, well, it is showing the source of this specific collects-snak, so I think that makes it a qualifier, right? A property, that is being used as a qualifier? I think some properties (such as comment) could apply either as a qualifier on a snak or as a property on an Item - whereas some properties like source would apply typically only as a qualifier upon a snak. Right? If I am using concepts incorrectly, please let me know - it's certainly possible I have the wrong mental model!

:: {{reply_to|Podehaye}} erm, well, it is showing the source of this specific {{P|10}}-snak, so I think that makes it a qualifier, right? A property, that is being used as a qualifier? I think some properties (such as {{Q|1048}}) could apply either as a qualifier on a snak or as a property on an Item - whereas some properties like {{Q|1117}} would apply typically only as a qualifier upon a snak. Right? If I am using concepts incorrectly, please let me know - it's certainly possible I have the wrong mental model!