Difference between revisions of "List of references on data licenses (Q2008)"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Changed claim: reference URL (P33): https://michaelweinberg.org/post/150123246460/the-cost-of-a-successful-creative-commons-and-open) |
(Changed claim: reference URL (P33): https://michaelweinberg.org/post/150123246460/the-cost-of-a-successful-creative-commons-and-open) |
||
| Property / reference URL: https://michaelweinberg.org/post/150123246460/the-cost-of-a-successful-creative-commons-and-open / qualifier | |||
| + | comment: Among other things, this has allowed to OSS/CC community to impose its ethos on people who do not care about openness. Threat of a copyright lawsuit means people and companies who just want to access the shared stuff have to play by the openness rules too. | ||
Revision as of 00:09, 20 December 2019
No description defined
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English |
List of references on data licenses
|
No description defined
|
Statements
it's not the same to give automated credit, even if you can technically do it
0 references
goes into motivations for the attempt at copylefting data
0 references
0 references
copyright-based copyleft licenses are a dead-end if the work is not copyrightable, but patent or trademark based solutions might be an option
Without copyright, the conditions baked into OSS/CC become legally meaningless. The “stick” that backs them up disappears.
Within the world of copyrightable stuff, these limitations are enforceable because failing to follow them voids the license. And without a license, the now-unauthorized sharing is a violation of the creator’s copyright.
Among other things, this has allowed to OSS/CC community to impose its ethos on people who do not care about openness. Threat of a copyright lawsuit means people and companies who just want to access the shared stuff have to play by the openness rules too.
0 references