15,627
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: + + + +
no edit summary
== qualifiers too? ==
This is a great idea. And that graph is fantastic! I wonder if we should add something similar "qualifiers for this property".
This is a great idea. And that graph is fantastic! I wonder if we should add something similar "qualifiers for this property".
I would for example add {{P|27}} and {{Q|1117}} as qualifiers typically added under {{P|10}}. Thoughts {{reply_to|Podehaye}} {{reply_to|Hanz0mon}}? -- [[User:Alexbfree|Alexbfree]] ([[User talk:Alexbfree|talk]]) 15:47, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
I would for example add {{P|27}} and {{Q|1117}} as qualifiers typically added under {{P|10}}. Thoughts {{reply_to|Podehaye}} {{reply_to|Hanz0mon}}? -- [[User:Alexbfree|Alexbfree]] ([[User talk:Alexbfree|talk]]) 15:47, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
: {{reply_to|Alexbfree}} yes, we should seek to extend this technique to have the expressivity you are seeking with the page [[Project:Vocabulary/GDPR]]. one comment though: you use {{Q|1117}} as a qualifier, but I think you mean a property, no? (also on [[Project:Vocabulary/GDPR]]). [[User:Podehaye|Podehaye]] ([[User talk:Podehaye|talk]]) 16:24, 11 February 2020 (UTC)