Difference between revisions of "Online Content Regulation (Q3942)"

From Wikibase Personal data
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(‎Created claim: instance of (P3): report (Q2527))
(‎Created claim: date (P100): 17 February 2020)
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Property / official website
 +
Property / official website: https://about.fb.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Charting-A-Way-Forward_Online-Content-Regulation-White-Paper-1.pdf / rank
 +
Normal rank
Property / publisher
 +
Property / publisher: Facebook / rank
 +
Normal rank
Property / comment
 +
Legal experts have cautioned that holding internet companies liable for the speech of their users could lead to the end of these services altogether. [...] Such liability would stifle innovation as well as individuals’ freedom of expression.
Property / comment: Legal experts have cautioned that holding internet companies liable for the speech of their users could lead to the end of these services altogether. [...] Such liability would stifle innovation as well as individuals’ freedom of expression. / rank
 +
Normal rank
Property / comment
 +
This model’s flaws appear all the more clear in light of the significant efforts many companies make to identify and remove harmful speech—efforts that often require the protective shield of intermediary liability protection laws.
Property / comment: This model’s flaws appear all the more clear in light of the significant efforts many companies make to identify and remove harmful speech—efforts that often require the protective shield of intermediary liability protection laws. / rank
 +
Normal rank
Property / date
 +
17 February 2020
Timestamp+2020-02-17T00:00:00Z
Timezone+00:00
CalendarGregorian
Precision1 day
Before0
After0
Property / date: 17 February 2020 / rank
 +
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 09:16, 18 February 2020

white paper published by Facebook on February 2020
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Online Content Regulation
white paper published by Facebook on February 2020

    Statements

    0 references
    0 references
    Legal experts have cautioned that holding internet companies liable for the speech of their users could lead to the end of these services altogether. [...] Such liability would stifle innovation as well as individuals’ freedom of expression.
    0 references
    This model’s flaws appear all the more clear in light of the significant efforts many companies make to identify and remove harmful speech—efforts that often require the protective shield of intermediary liability protection laws.
    0 references
    17 February 2020
    0 references