(Q4492)
Revision as of 20:33, 17 April 2020 by Genferei (talk | contribs) (Created claim: Property:P203: Data protection experts and computer experts criticized the app violently because its code is not disclosed and can be checked independently. "This is about highly sensitive data such as resting heart rate and sleep quality. You have to be extremely careful here. To build trust, you have to the programming code should be open source, so it can be viewed publicly. ")
Statements
100,000 people - or 10% of Germany’s smartwatch and fitness tracker users - would sign up. Even 10,000 would be analytically useful
0 references
17/04/2004 400 000 downloads-40 times more than expected.
0 references
Data protection experts and computer experts criticized the app violently because its code is not disclosed and can be checked independently. "This is about highly sensitive data such as resting heart rate and sleep quality. You have to be extremely careful here. To build trust, you have to the programming code should be open source, so it can be viewed publicly. "
0 references