Difference between revisions of "Property talk:P291"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | == qualifiers too? == | ||
| + | |||
This is a great idea. And that graph is fantastic! I wonder if we should add something similar "qualifiers for this property". | This is a great idea. And that graph is fantastic! I wonder if we should add something similar "qualifiers for this property". | ||
I would for example add {{P|27}} and {{Q|1117}} as qualifiers typically added under {{P|10}}. Thoughts {{reply_to|Podehaye}} {{reply_to|Hanz0mon}}? -- [[User:Alexbfree|Alexbfree]] ([[User talk:Alexbfree|talk]]) 15:47, 11 February 2020 (UTC) | I would for example add {{P|27}} and {{Q|1117}} as qualifiers typically added under {{P|10}}. Thoughts {{reply_to|Podehaye}} {{reply_to|Hanz0mon}}? -- [[User:Alexbfree|Alexbfree]] ([[User talk:Alexbfree|talk]]) 15:47, 11 February 2020 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | : {{reply_to|Alexbfree}} yes, we should seek to extend this technique to have the expressivity you are seeking with the page [[Project:Vocabulary/GDPR]]. one comment though: you use {{Q|1117}} as a qualifier, but I think you mean a property, no? (also on [[Project:Vocabulary/GDPR]]). [[User:Podehaye|Podehaye]] ([[User talk:Podehaye|talk]]) 16:24, 11 February 2020 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 16:24, 11 February 2020
qualifiers too?
This is a great idea. And that graph is fantastic! I wonder if we should add something similar "qualifiers for this property". I would for example add named as (P27) and source (Q1117) as qualifiers typically added under collects (P10). Thoughts @Podehaye: @Hanz0mon:? -- Alexbfree (talk) 15:47, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
- @Alexbfree: yes, we should seek to extend this technique to have the expressivity you are seeking with the page Project:Vocabulary/GDPR. one comment though: you use source (Q1117) as a qualifier, but I think you mean a property, no? (also on Project:Vocabulary/GDPR). Podehaye (talk) 16:24, 11 February 2020 (UTC)