Difference between revisions of "Project:Vocabulary"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | This project has two levels: | + | This project has two levels of reflexion: |
* how to model the offline and online world, and their interface; | * how to model the offline and online world, and their interface; | ||
* how to make this model fit into our wiki instance. | * how to make this model fit into our wiki instance. | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
The two are likely to involve different types of contributors and contributions. Both should listen to each other, and to [[Project:Tools]] which critically depends on both levels of choices. | The two are likely to involve different types of contributors and contributions. Both should listen to each other, and to [[Project:Tools]] which critically depends on both levels of choices. | ||
| − | + | For clarity at the moment, rather than dividing along those two levels, we currently divide matters along "sectors". We hope that eventually this will change. | |
| + | |||
* [[Project:Ontology/IoT]] | * [[Project:Ontology/IoT]] | ||
* [[Project:Ontology/GDPR]] | * [[Project:Ontology/GDPR]] | ||
| − | == | + | |
| − | + | == Documenting == | |
| + | To get started quickly, we recommend simply different phases: | ||
| + | 1. pointing to "good enough in class" examples (the best in class examples risk being overly complex) | ||
| + | 2. document how this is done using the Q and P templates | ||
Revision as of 22:30, 6 February 2020
This project has two levels of reflexion:
- how to model the offline and online world, and their interface;
- how to make this model fit into our wiki instance.
The two are likely to involve different types of contributors and contributions. Both should listen to each other, and to Project:Tools which critically depends on both levels of choices.
For clarity at the moment, rather than dividing along those two levels, we currently divide matters along "sectors". We hope that eventually this will change.
Documenting
To get started quickly, we recommend simply different phases: 1. pointing to "good enough in class" examples (the best in class examples risk being overly complex) 2. document how this is done using the Q and P templates