Line 2: |
Line 2: |
| | | |
| == Presentation== | | == Presentation== |
| + | general questions useful for the hackathon: |
| + | |
| + | From the perspective of medical anthropology, intersectionality: |
| + | |
| + | Target an Application that creates a social profile to be utilized to facilitate social interaction minimizing socioeconomic damage during pandemics (sadly they are here to stay) and unlike SARS1 that ground pockets of economy to a halt, SARS2 has ground the global economy to a halt. |
| + | |
| + | • A central tenet – there is no biomedical (vaccine, antiretroviral) response to COVID19 |
| + | • As with SARS1, MERS etc, medical treatments are possible, but unlikely |
| + | • This is key, our response is a social response (physical distancing, shelter in place) limiting social interaction |
| + | • End result is to break the chain of transmission of COVID19 utilizing app that contains a social profile to identify safe interactions |
| + | • Allow privacy but health identifiers |
| + | • Are the app connections both govt and society-based? |
| + | • What is the main target function of the app? |
| + | • Data sets and math to create? |
| + | • Critical not to infringe on rights in the West. |
| + | • Asian approach of lock down can’t be used in the West |
| + | • Foucault’s biopower in play, the peoples power and rights fed back up to the government |
| + | • The app navigates this contour of human rights versus government control |
| + | • Surveys to get profiles? What is the value/danger of profiling? |
| + | • How does the app contribute to the social response to COVID19, since that is our only response? |