Difference between revisions of "Project:License"

From Wikibase Personal data
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 21: Line 21:
  
 
== See also ==
 
== See also ==
 
+
{{Q|2008}}
* https://lu.is/blog/2016/09/21/copyleft-attribution-and-data-other-considerations/
 
* https://lu.is/blog/2016/09/14/copyleft-and-data-databases-as-poor-subject/
 
* https://lu.is/blog/2016/09/26/public-licenses-and-data-so-what-to-do-instead/
 
* https://www.twobirds.com/en/news/articles/2015/global/ip-and-it-law-bytes-december-2015/database-right-meaning-of-database
 
* https://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/
 
etc
 

Revision as of 21:43, 13 November 2019

We still have to decide on a license.

A priori everything that is entered right now is done according to the Terms of Use. This can and should be relicensed through some form of open licenses. Things would be a lot easier if we were the only project working in this field. We are not, which is a good thing.

Wikidata: All structured data from the main, Property, Lexeme, and EntitySchema namespaces is available under the Creative Commons CC0 License; text in the other namespaces is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.


To help choose the right license, here are some important datasets and their associated license.


See also

List of references on data licenses (Q2008)