News/20190524
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Personal overall lessons from the Sophia-Antipolis workshop of 2019.05.22-23
- Lawyers need to "steer" more technologists towards what is interesting for enforcement, which might be different from what is interesting from an engineering standpoint.
- Technologists have some difficulty in expressing what is being measured, some words actually seem to be missing.
- The dichotomy first party/third party is losing some of the utility that it carried before: third-party analytics cookies are behaving like first party cookies. In reality, there are chains of calls from n to n+1.
- If we want to be precise there are two technical levels to describe what is going on:
- Layer 1 is on the graph of calls, and why those calls are made. Reasons can include:
- fetching an image (like a tracking pixel);
- fetching a script;
- fetching some other type of content (which? <please fill!>);
- redirects, of which there might be more than one kind;
- others? <please fill!>
- Layer 2 describes the packets of information circulating over this graph of calls. Tiny tidbits get exchanged:
- through automatic sending of cookies when reaching out to the right domain;
- as URL parameters in redirects
- others? <please fill!>
- Layer 1 is on the graph of calls, and why those calls are made. Reasons can include:
- Lawyers and technologists are somewhat talking past each other, which is natural:
- technologists have no settled vocabulary on their side to explain what is happening, with the granularity necessary for the lawyers to provide opinions
- "it depends": vocabulary in law is by definition stretchable and/or carries heavy meaning.