User contributions
11 December 2019
Item:Q2486
wbsetclaim-create:2||1: participant (P63): Paul-Olivier Dehaye (Q351)
+418
Item:Q2486
wbsetclaim-create:2||1: date (P100): 11 December 2019
+513
Item:Q2486
wbsetclaim-create:2||1: instance of (P3): event (Q773)
+416
Item:Q2486
wbeditentity-create:2|en: Transnational Courier Federation meeting in Brussels
Item:Q779
wbsetlabel-set:1|fr: Uber Eats
+1
Item:Q1023
wbcreateredirect:0||Q1023|Q779
-98
Item:Q779
wbmergeitems-from:0||Q1023: merge.js
+7,950
Item:Q1023
wbmergeitems-to:0||Q779: merge.js
-7,974
Item:Q2485
wbsetclaim-create:2||1: instance of (P3): identity resolution service (Q559)
+401
Item:Q2485
wbsetclaim-update:2||1|1: has (P144): data subject access request service (Q710)
+312
Item:Q2485
wbsetclaim-create:2||1: has (P144): data subject access request service (Q710)
+420
Item:Q2485
wbsetclaim-create:2||1: official website (P15): https://pipl.com
+350
Item:Q2485
wbsetclaim-create:2||1: instance of (P3): data controller (Q96)
+414
Item:Q2485
wbeditentity-create:2|en: pipl
Item:Q2434
wbsetlabel-set:1|en: Frank Pasquale
-1
10 December 2019
Item:Q898
wbsetclaim-create:2||1: e-mail address (P17): mailto:dpo@adara.com
+353
Item:Q2438
wbsetclaim-create:2||1: instance of (P3): organization (Q401)
+416
Item:Q2438
wbeditentity-create:2|en: International Data Spaces Assocation
Item:Q2437
wbsetclaim-create:2||1: instance of (P3): data controller (Q96)
+414
Item:Q2437
wbeditentity-create:2|en: ActionVibe
9 December 2019
Item:Q101
wbsetclaim-create:2||1: collects (P10): exchanges with the back office (Q2433)
+404
Item:Q2433
wbeditentity-create:2|en: exchanges with the back office
Item:Q101
wbsetclaim-update:2||1|1: collects (P10): contract (Q2394)
+300
Item:Q2430
wbsetclaim-create:2||1: see also property (P223): ICO data protection public register number (P222)
+424
Property:P223
wbeditentity-create:2|en: see also property
Property:P222
wbsetclaim-create:2||1: see also (P12): ICO data protection public register (Q2430)
+419
Item:Q2431
wbsetclaim-create:2||1: subclass of (P4): document (Q2408)
+418
Item:Q2432
wbsetclaim-create:2||1: country (P55): United Kingdom (Q1135)
+420
Item:Q2432
wbsetclaim-create:2||1: instance of (P3): data protection authority (Q724)
+416
Item:Q2430
wbsetclaim-create:2||1: author (P121): Information Commissioner's Office (Q2432)
+422
Item:Q2432
wbeditentity-create:2|en: Information Commissioner's Office, UK data protection authority
Item:Q2430
wbsetclaim-create:2||1: official website (P15): https://ico.org.uk/ESDWebPages/Search
+371
Item:Q2430
wbsetclaim-create:2||1: instance of (P3): register (Q2431)
+418
Item:Q2431
wbeditentity-create:2|en: register
Item:Q2430
wbeditentity-create:2|en: ICO data protection public register
Item:Q2401
wbsetclaim-create:2||1: comment (P126): Governing algorithmic decision-making is hard. [] in significant part, solving the governance problem is hard because we cannot agree on why to regulate. A growing literature now focuses on regulating alg...
+708
Item:Q2401
wbsetclaim-create:2||1: comment (P126): If aggregated by third parties—the media or civil society—individual stories can trigger soft accountability mechanisms, like market responses or naming-and-shaming. The question is whether the indivi...
+690
Item:Q2401
wbsetclaim-create:2||1: comment (P126): because the GDPR relies on collaborative governance, its attempts at individual transparency must serve a dual role. Absent policy changes, the GDPR’s individual transparency provisions will need to ser...
+670
Item:Q2401
wbsetclaim-create:2||1: comment (P126): To accomplish meaningful oversight, both NGOs and the press will need to link individual disclosures into politically effective group narratives, revealing what is going on over an algorithmic decision-ma...
+661
Item:Q2401
wbsetclaim-update:2||1: comment (P126): [high-quality collaborative governance in the absence of true public transparency] will depend on the ability of NGOs and other policy advocates to harness the GDPR’s system of individual transparency r...
+80
Item:Q2401
wbsetclaim-create:2||1: comment (P126): It will depend on the ability of NGOs and other policy advocates to harness the GDPR’s system of individual transparency rights coupled possibly with freedom of information laws to obtain both enforceme...
+545
Item:Q2401
wbsetclaim-create:2||1: comment (P126): It is possible that despite the GDPR’s lack of public transparency and input by third parties, impact assessments and maybe draft codes of conduct will be made available to the public through other mean...
+597
Item:Q2401
wbsetclaim-create:2||1: comment (P126): An impact assessment, in other words, is supposed to be a tripartite conversation between a regulated entity, the regulator, and third parties such as impacted persons or civil society organizations. In t...
+609
Item:Q2401
wbsetclaim-create:2||1: comment (P126): The GDPR for the most part envisions collaboration as taking place between regulators and regulated private parties, to the exclusion of third parties, such as civil society or external experts. This thre...
+674
Item:Q2427
wbsetclaim-create:2||1: subclass of (P4): document (Q2408)
+418
Item:Q2425
wbremoveclaims-remove:1|: instance of (P3): data (Q1451)
-403
Item:Q2429
wbsetclaim-create:2||1: instance of (P3): public authority (Q759)
+416
Item:Q2426
wbsetclaim-create:2||1: official website (P15): https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/article29/item-detail.cfm?item_id=612053
+404
Item:Q2426
wbsetclaim-update:2||1|1: author (P121): European Data Protection Board (Q2428)
+337
Item:Q2426
wbsetclaim-create:2||1: author (P121): European Data Protection Board (Q2428)
+405