Difference between revisions of "Project:License"
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
} | } | ||
LIMIT 100}} important datasets and their associated license]. | LIMIT 100}} important datasets and their associated license]. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | == See also == | ||
| + | |||
| + | https://lu.is/blog/2016/09/21/copyleft-attribution-and-data-other-considerations/ | ||
| + | https://lu.is/blog/2016/09/14/copyleft-and-data-databases-as-poor-subject/ | ||
| + | https://lu.is/blog/2016/09/26/public-licenses-and-data-so-what-to-do-instead/ | ||
| + | https://www.twobirds.com/en/news/articles/2015/global/ip-and-it-law-bytes-december-2015/database-right-meaning-of-database | ||
| + | https://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/ | ||
| + | etc | ||
Revision as of 16:20, 13 November 2019
We still have to decide on a license.
A priori everything that is entered right now is done according to the Terms of Use. This can and should be relicensed through some form of open licenses. Things would be a lot easier if we were the only project working in this field. We are not, which is a good thing.
Wikidata: All structured data from the main, Property, Lexeme, and EntitySchema namespaces is available under the Creative Commons CC0 License; text in the other namespaces is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
To help choose the right license, here are some important datasets and their associated license.
See also
https://lu.is/blog/2016/09/21/copyleft-attribution-and-data-other-considerations/ https://lu.is/blog/2016/09/14/copyleft-and-data-databases-as-poor-subject/ https://lu.is/blog/2016/09/26/public-licenses-and-data-so-what-to-do-instead/ https://www.twobirds.com/en/news/articles/2015/global/ip-and-it-law-bytes-december-2015/database-right-meaning-of-database https://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/ etc