Difference between revisions of "System Risk Indication (Q3747)"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created claim: instance of (P3): case law (Q212)) |
(Changed claim: instance of (P3): case law (Q212)) |
||||||||||||||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||||||||||||||
| Property / instance of: case law / qualifier | |||||||||||||||
| + | date: 5 February 2020
| ||||||||||||||
| Property / comment | |||||||||||||||
| + | The court has concluded that the use of SyRI is unlawful as it violates the right to privacy. The court found that the Dutch government had failed to strike a balance between the right to privacy and the public interest in detecting welfare fraud, and that the use of SyRI was disproportionate to the aim it sought to achieve. | ||||||||||||||
| Property / comment: The court has concluded that the use of SyRI is unlawful as it violates the right to privacy. The court found that the Dutch government had failed to strike a balance between the right to privacy and the public interest in detecting welfare fraud, and that the use of SyRI was disproportionate to the aim it sought to achieve. / rank | |||||||||||||||
| + | Normal rank | ||||||||||||||
Latest revision as of 07:50, 7 February 2020
Statements
The court has concluded that the use of SyRI is unlawful as it violates the right to privacy. The court found that the Dutch government had failed to strike a balance between the right to privacy and the public interest in detecting welfare fraud, and that the use of SyRI was disproportionate to the aim it sought to achieve.
0 references