Difference between revisions of "User Tracking on Academic Publisher Platforms (Q3302)"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Changed claim: comment (P126): 15 platforms studied, analysis made with Ghostery) |
(Created claim: Youtube ID (P151): W0HxStRH0ec) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Property / comment | Property / comment | ||
| - | + | 15 platforms studied, analysis performed with Ghostery | |
| Property / Youtube ID | |||
| + | |||
| Property / Youtube ID: W0HxStRH0ec / rank | |||
| + | Normal rank | ||
Latest revision as of 18:28, 13 January 2020
No description defined
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English |
User Tracking on Academic Publisher Platforms
|
No description defined
|
Statements
On average, each publisher site had 18 third-party assets being loaded on their article pages. The median was 10. One publisher platform, the only one I will name here today, had 0: InformPubsOnline. One platform had over 100. In total, I found 139 different third-party asset sources across these 15 articles.
0 references
15 platforms studied, analysis performed with Ghostery
0 references