Difference between revisions of "Youtubers Union transparency initiative (Q1831)"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Changed claim: has (P144): proposal (Q1837)) |
(Removed claim: see also (P12): What YouTube is Hiding From You! (P-Score, Video Ratings, Throttling Videos) (Q1868)) |
||
| (21 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Property / instance of | |||
| - | |||
| Property / instance of: activity / rank | |||
| - | |||
| Property / has: proposal / qualifier | |||
| - | |||
| Property / has: proposal / qualifier | |||
| - | |||
| Property / official website | |||
| + | |||
| Property / official website: https://www.facebook.com/groups/youtuberunion/ / rank | |||
| + | Normal rank | ||
| Property / official website | |||
| + | |||
| Property / official website: https://fairtube.info/en/press / rank | |||
| + | Normal rank | ||
| Property / see also | |||
| + | |||
| Property / see also: Youtube P-Score / rank | |||
| + | Normal rank | ||
| Property / has | |||
| + | |||
| Property / has: proposal / rank | |||
| + | Normal rank | ||
| Property / has: proposal / qualifier | |||
| + | comment: Give clear explanations for individual decisions — for example, if a video is demonetized, which parts of the video violated which criteria in the Advertiser-Friendly Content Guidelines? | ||
| Property / has | |||
| + | |||
| Property / has: proposal / rank | |||
| + | Normal rank | ||
| Property / has: proposal / qualifier | |||
| + | comment: Let YouTubers contest decisions that have negative consequences | ||
| Property / has | |||
| + | |||
| Property / has: proposal / rank | |||
| + | Normal rank | ||
| Property / has: proposal / qualifier | |||
| + | comment: Let YouTubers contest decisions that have negative consequences | ||
| Property / has | |||
| + | |||
| Property / has: proposal / rank | |||
| + | Normal rank | ||
| Property / has: proposal / qualifier | |||
| + | comment: Create an independent mediation board for resolving disputes (here the Ombuds Office of the Crowdsourcing Code of Conduct can offer relevant lessons) | ||
| Property / has | |||
| + | |||
| Property / has: proposal / rank | |||
| + | Normal rank | ||
| Property / has: proposal / qualifier | |||
| + | comment: Formal participation of YouTubers in important decisions, for example through a YouTuber Advisory Board | ||
| Property / Youtube ID | |||
| + | |||
| Property / Youtube ID: oZZ5Kouj_hQ / rank | |||
| + | Normal rank | ||
| Property / instance of | |||
| + | |||
| Property / instance of: activity / rank | |||
| + | Normal rank | ||
| Property / part of | |||
| + | |||
| Property / part of: future-of-work and data protection / rank | |||
| + | Normal rank | ||
Latest revision as of 09:19, 1 November 2019
No description defined
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English |
Youtubers Union transparency initiative
|
No description defined
|
Statements
Publish all categories and decision criteria that affect monetization and views of videos
0 references
Give clear explanations for individual decisions — for example, if a video is demonetized, which parts of the video violated which criteria in the Advertiser-Friendly Content Guidelines?
0 references
Create an independent mediation board for resolving disputes (here the Ombuds Office of the Crowdsourcing Code of Conduct can offer relevant lessons)
0 references