Difference between revisions of "Project talk:Vocabulary/GDPR"

From Wikibase Personal data
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "comment from @Hanzomon on Q988: IMO not a good example, because this is not part of the vocabulary ("classes" and properties), but an individual item. We should clarify some b...")
 
Line 1: Line 1:
comment from @Hanzomon on Q988: IMO not a good example, because this is not part of the vocabulary ("classes" and properties), but an individual item. We should clarify some basics, otherwise the whole exercise looks very confusing to newcomers. Can we activate the wikidata index tab for discussions? This inline comment style is not good. Otherwise we can agree to keep discussions to slack.
+
comment from @Hanzomon on Q988: IMO not a good example, because this is not part of the vocabulary ("classes" and properties), but an individual item. We should clarify some basics, otherwise the whole exercise looks very confusing to newcomers.

Revision as of 13:32, 9 February 2020

comment from @Hanzomon on Q988: IMO not a good example, because this is not part of the vocabulary ("classes" and properties), but an individual item. We should clarify some basics, otherwise the whole exercise looks very confusing to newcomers.