Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 10: Line 10:  
|text=
 
|text=
 
Eben Moglen has often pointed out that anyone who attacks the GPL is at a disadvantage, because if they somehow show that the license is legally invalid, then they get copyright’s “default”: which is to say, they don’t get anything. So they are forced to fight about the specific terms, rather than the validity of the license as a whole.
 
Eben Moglen has often pointed out that anyone who attacks the GPL is at a disadvantage, because if they somehow show that the license is legally invalid, then they get copyright’s “default”: which is to say, they don’t get anything. So they are forced to fight about the specific terms, rather than the validity of the license as a whole.
 +
 
In contrast, in much of the world (and certainly in the US), if you show that a database license is legally invalid, then you get database’s default: which is to say, you get everything. So someone who doesn’t want to follow the copyleft has very, very strong incentives to demolish your license altogether.
 
In contrast, in much of the world (and certainly in the US), if you show that a database license is legally invalid, then you get database’s default: which is to say, you get everything. So someone who doesn’t want to follow the copyleft has very, very strong incentives to demolish your license altogether.
 
|author=Luis Villa
 
|author=Luis Villa
|title=''[https://lu.is/blog/2016/09/12/copyleft-and-data-database-law-as-poor-platform/ Copyleft and data: database law as (poor) platform]''
+
|title={{Q|2905}}''
}}  
+
}}
 +
 
 
=== Other datasets ===
 
=== Other datasets ===
 
For convenience, we maintain a list of [[related datasets]] and their licenses.
 
For convenience, we maintain a list of [[related datasets]] and their licenses.

Navigation menu