Difference between revisions of "Early in the epidemic: impact of preprints on global discourse about COVID-19 transmissibility (Q4361)"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created claim: DOI (P62): https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30113-3) |
(Added [en] description: schorlarly article published on March 24, 2020) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| description / en | description / en | ||
| + | schorlarly article published on March 24, 2020 | ||
| Property / DOI | Property / DOI | ||
| - | + | ||
| Property / quote | |||
| + | "Our work showcases the powerful role preprints can have during public health crises because of the timeliness with which they can disseminate new information. Even prestigious journals now permit the sharing of important findings before peer review and that the use of preprint platforms does not jeopardise future peer-reviewed publication" | ||
| Property / quote: "Our work showcases the powerful role preprints can have during public health crises because of the timeliness with which they can disseminate new information. Even prestigious journals now permit the sharing of important findings before peer review and that the use of preprint platforms does not jeopardise future peer-reviewed publication" / rank | |||
| + | Normal rank | ||
| Property / official website | |||
| + | |||
| Property / official website: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2214109X20301133 / rank | |||
| + | Normal rank | ||
Latest revision as of 16:18, 3 April 2020
Statements
24 March 2020
0 references
"Our work showcases the powerful role preprints can have during public health crises because of the timeliness with which they can disseminate new information. Even prestigious journals now permit the sharing of important findings before peer review and that the use of preprint platforms does not jeopardise future peer-reviewed publication"
0 references