Changes

** " “for feminism: no is a political labure”. In other words, “if your position is precarious you might not be able to afford no. [...] This is why the less precarious might have a political obligation to say no on behalf of or alongside those who are more precarious” (Ahmed 2017)

** " “for feminism: no is a political labure”. In other words, “if your position is precarious you might not be able to afford no. [...] This is why the less precarious might have a political obligation to say no on behalf of or alongside those who are more precarious” (Ahmed 2017)

** "we, as consumers of services from a very few companies that hold the monopoly of the most used communications tools and social media networks, are deprived of “no” when we face the terms and conditions of such platforms. We are forced to take a oversimplified binary option between agree or disagree, while the latest ultimately means opting for some level of digital exclusion."

** "we, as consumers of services from a very few companies that hold the monopoly of the most used communications tools and social media networks, are deprived of “no” when we face the terms and conditions of such platforms. We are forced to take a oversimplified binary option between agree or disagree, while the latest ultimately means opting for some level of digital exclusion."

** ". This situation represents structural problem, which, from the feminist perspectives that we mapped before, won’t

** ". This situation represents structural problem, which, from the feminist perspectives that we mapped before, won’t be solved by the individual level. "

be solved by the individual level. "

** " the structural problem will remain, unless there is a power shift towards allowing the collective possibility of consenting to something else. "

** " the structural problem will remain, unless there is a power shift towards allowing the collective possibility of consenting to something else. "

** " It is obvious an individual framing of consent, based in the assumption that we are all autonomous, free and rational individuals with

** " It is obvious an individual framing of consent, based in the assumption that we are all autonomous, free and rational individuals with capacity to consent, disregarded our possibility of doing so due to unequal power dynamics. "

capacity to consent, disregarded our possibility of doing so due to unequal power dynamics. "

** "critical adherents" vs "consent agnostics"

** "critical adherents" vs "consent agnostics"

** " privacy is not a thing or an abstract right, but an environmental condition that enables situated subjects to navigate within

** " privacy is not a thing or an abstract right, but an environmental condition that enables situated subjects to navigate within preexisting cultural and social matrices (Cohen, 2012, 2018)"

preexisting cultural and social matrices (Cohen, 2012, 2018)"

** "Therefore, as context is crucial to consent, we have to accept its fluid nature, which is something that the #TimesUp movement has brought into public debate: “Context is crucial to consent, we can change our opinion over time depending on how we feel in any given moment and how we evaluate the situation” (Carmi, 2018)."

** "Therefore, as context is crucial to consent, we have to accept its fluid nature, which is something that the #TimesUp movement has brought into public debate: “Context is crucial to consent, we can change our opinion over time depending on how we feel in any given moment and how we evaluate the situation” (Carmi, 2018)."

* [http://criticallegalthinking.com/2019/04/10/cfp-workshop-on-feminist-data-protection-berlin-20-nov-2019/ Berlin workshop], November 20th 2019

* [http://criticallegalthinking.com/2019/04/10/cfp-workshop-on-feminist-data-protection-berlin-20-nov-2019/ Berlin workshop], November 20th 2019

* [https://bookbook.pubpub.org/data-feminism Data feminism book]

* [https://bookbook.pubpub.org/data-feminism Data feminism book]