Automated contact tracing is not a coronavirus panacea (Q4465)

From Wikibase Personal data
Revision as of 17:59, 14 April 2020 by Genferei (talk | contribs) (‎Created claim: Property:P15: https://blog.gds-gov.tech/automated-contact-tracing-is-not-a-coronavirus-panacea-57fb3ce61d98)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
blogpost published by Jason Bay, product lead for TraceTogether
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Automated contact tracing is not a coronavirus panacea
blogpost published by Jason Bay, product lead for TraceTogether

    Statements

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    11 April 2020
    0 references
    An automated algorithm will necessarily generate both false negatives and false positives. A human contact tracer will similarly make mistakes. However, because a human contact tracer would seek to incorporate information beyond just physical proximity, he/she can correct for systematic biases introduced by automated notification system.
    0 references