Line 26: |
Line 26: |
| | | |
| ===Discussion=== | | ===Discussion=== |
| + | |
| + | 1. Started by public health surveillance, and their ethics and laws. Rules of privacy already allow the state to limit the freedom. Enhanced with digital systems, like asking for digital surveillance. What are limits, etc. |
| + | |
| + | 2. Starts from the bottom up, difficult to conceptualise. Not part of standard public health surveillance. If imagine new ecosystem of contributors, not to enhance surveillance. Should they need a framework for themselves beyond the laws. |
| + | What's is the driver?<br> |
| + | what's are the limits?<br> |
| + | Should we need a framework?<br> |
| '''Start with anthropology'''<br> | | '''Start with anthropology'''<br> |
| | | |
Line 51: |
Line 58: |
| * unemployed person healed from COVID-19 | | * unemployed person healed from COVID-19 |
| * isolated elder person | | * isolated elder person |
− | * family with home-school | + | * family with home-school |
− | | |
− | | |
− | 1. Started by public health surveillance, and their ethics and laws. Rules of privacy already allow the state to limit the freedom. Enhanced with digital systems, like asking for digital surveillance. What are limits, etc.
| |
− | | |
− | 2. Starts from the bottom up, difficult to conceptualise. Not part of standard public health surveillance. If imagine new ecosystem of contributors, not to enhance surveillance. Should they need a framework for themselves beyond the laws.
| |
− | What's is the driver?<br>
| |
− | what's are the limits?<br>
| |
− | Should we need a framework?<br>
| |