Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 1: Line 1: −
=Why?=
+
=Background=
 
Data protection activism, particularly efforts against profiling and unaccountable automated decision-making, has an [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intersectionality intersectional dimension].  
 
Data protection activism, particularly efforts against profiling and unaccountable automated decision-making, has an [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intersectionality intersectional dimension].  
   Line 6: Line 6:  
There is a class component: negative effects increase on the poor. This is often narrowly conceived around privacy ("the rich can buy their privacy"), but there is a broader link: gig work for instance leverages extensively automated decision-making.  
 
There is a class component: negative effects increase on the poor. This is often narrowly conceived around privacy ("the rich can buy their privacy"), but there is a broader link: gig work for instance leverages extensively automated decision-making.  
   −
Finally, there is a gender component, which should be explored.  
+
Finally, there is a clear gender component to data protection.
 +
 
 +
=Why?=
 +
The main topic here is in asking how history of the feminist movement, and navigating these intersectionalities, can inform PersonalData.IO's activism.
 +
 
 
=Questions=
 
=Questions=
 
What lessons can data protection activists draw from the feminist movement?  Examples:  
 
What lessons can data protection activists draw from the feminist movement?  Examples:  

Navigation menu