Difference between revisions of "Critical Limitations of Digital Epidemiology (Q4748)"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created claim: quote (P203): Older people, children, persons without smartphones due to lower-income and members of vulnerable populations.) |
(Created claim: date (P100): June 2020) |
||||||||||||||
| Property / date | |||||||||||||||
| + | June 2020
| ||||||||||||||
| Property / date: June 2020 / rank | |||||||||||||||
| + | Normal rank | ||||||||||||||
Latest revision as of 23:45, 10 February 2021
journal article from 'Survey Research Methods' published in 2020
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English |
Critical Limitations of Digital Epidemiology
|
journal article from 'Survey Research Methods' published in 2020
|
Statements
From a statistical and methodological perspective, the use of smart devices suffers from under-coverage and non response, which are rarely addressed by proponents of digital epidemiology. [..]. For COVID-19 surveillance, we recommend that instead of digital epidemiology, available routine data and random samples should be used
0 references
The main methodological problem is the selection process described. The sample of the population actually using the app will not be a random sample. It seems likely that especially subpopulations with a higher prevalence of undetected infections will have lower coverage rates by the apps:
0 references
Older people, children, persons without smartphones due to lower-income and members of vulnerable populations.
0 references
June 2020
0 references