Difference between revisions of "Project talk:Vocabulary/GDPR"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "comment from @Hanzomon on Q988: IMO not a good example, because this is not part of the vocabulary ("classes" and properties), but an individual item. We should clarify some b...") |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | comment from @Hanzomon on Q988: IMO not a good example, because this is not part of the vocabulary ("classes" and properties), but an individual item. We should clarify some basics, otherwise the whole exercise looks very confusing to newcomers | + | comment from @Hanzomon on Q988: IMO not a good example, because this is not part of the vocabulary ("classes" and properties), but an individual item. We should clarify some basics, otherwise the whole exercise looks very confusing to newcomers. |
Revision as of 13:32, 9 February 2020
comment from @Hanzomon on Q988: IMO not a good example, because this is not part of the vocabulary ("classes" and properties), but an individual item. We should clarify some basics, otherwise the whole exercise looks very confusing to newcomers.