Difference between revisions of "Project:Vocabulary/GDPR"

Revision as of 13:32, 9 February 2020

Use cases

The Ontology need to be suitable for data entries and the usages of those data. We need to identify use case and test the ontology against those.

Example

Swisscom (Q988)

Core snaks

instance of (P3) - data controller (Q96)
e-mail address (P17) - "mailto:johnny@example.com"
collects (P10) - some data points
official website (P15) - URL (optional really)
Wikidata item ID (P103) - Qxxx

(Q: how do we refer to privacy policy? there are a few different ways to do it)

Data rights snaks

Multiple choice between different options

References

PREFIX pdio: <https://wiki.personaldata.io/entity/>
PREFIX pdiot: <https://wiki.personaldata.io/prop/direct/>
PREFIX pdiop: <https://wiki.personaldata.io/prop/>
PREFIX pdiops: <https://wiki.personaldata.io/prop/statement/>
PREFIX pdiopq: <https://wiki.personaldata.io/prop/qualifier/>
SELECT ?item ?itemLabel WHERE {
  ?item pdiot:P110 pdio:Q3006.
  SERVICE wikibase:label {
    bd:serviceParam wikibase:language "en" . 
  }
}
LIMIT 100

sources on (GDPR) ontology modeling (embedded)

@@ Line 8: / Line 8: @@
 {{Q|988}}
-comment from @Hanzomon on Q988:
-IMO not a good example, because this is not part of the vocabulary ("classes" and properties), but an individual item.
-We should clarify some basics, otherwise the whole exercise looks very confusing to newcomers. Can we activate the wikidata index tab for discussions?
-This inline comment style is not good. Otherwise we can agree to keep discussions to slack.
 === Core snaks===