Difference between revisions of "Youtubers Union transparency initiative (Q1831)"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created claim: has (P144): proposal (Q1837)) |
(Changed claim: has (P144): proposal (Q1837)) |
||
| Property / has: proposal / qualifier | |||
| + | comment: Give clear explanations for individual decisions — for example, if a video is demonetized, which parts of the video violated which criteria in the Advertiser-Friendly Content Guidelines? | ||
Revision as of 12:37, 31 October 2019
No description defined
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English |
Youtubers Union transparency initiative
|
No description defined
|
Statements
Publish all categories and decision criteria that affect monetization and views of videos
Give clear explanations for individual decisions — for example, if a video is demonetized, which parts of the video violated which criteria in the Advertiser-Friendly Content Guidelines?
Give YouTubers a human contact person who is qualified and authorized to explain decisions that have negative consequences for YouTubers (and fix them if they are mistaken)
Let YouTubers contest decisions that have negative consequences
Create an independent mediation board for resolving disputes (here the Ombuds Office of the Crowdsourcing Code of Conduct can offer relevant lessons)
Formal participation of YouTubers in important decisions, for example through a YouTuber Advisory Board
0 references