Difference between revisions of "Ethics of Digital Contact Tracing and COVID-19: Who Is (Not) Free to Go? (Q4644)"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created a new Item: #quickstatements; #temporary_batch_1589822988367) |
(Created claim: quote (P203): The costs of remedying the pandemic must, ethically and pragmatically, be distributed fairly in a society. Digital tracing has the potential to transcend the trade-off between saving lives and livelihoods by freeing people from quarantine while containing the virus while, as we urged, also ensuring fairness.) |
||
| Property / quote | |||
| + | The costs of remedying the pandemic must, ethically and pragmatically, be distributed fairly in a society. Digital tracing has the potential to transcend the trade-off between saving lives and livelihoods by freeing people from quarantine while containing the virus while, as we urged, also ensuring fairness. | ||
| Property / quote: The costs of remedying the pandemic must, ethically and pragmatically, be distributed fairly in a society. Digital tracing has the potential to transcend the trade-off between saving lives and livelihoods by freeing people from quarantine while containing the virus while, as we urged, also ensuring fairness. / rank | |||
| + | Normal rank | ||
Revision as of 17:33, 18 May 2020
journal article from 'SSRN Electronic Journal' published in 2020
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English |
Ethics of Digital Contact Tracing and COVID-19: Who Is (Not) Free to Go?
|
journal article from 'SSRN Electronic Journal' published in 2020
|
Statements
The costs of remedying the pandemic must, ethically and pragmatically, be distributed fairly in a society. Digital tracing has the potential to transcend the trade-off between saving lives and livelihoods by freeing people from quarantine while containing the virus while, as we urged, also ensuring fairness.
0 references