Difference between revisions of "Events/HackCovid/2020-03-28/Group3"
Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
===Discussion=== | ===Discussion=== | ||
+ | |||
+ | 1. Started by public health surveillance, and their ethics and laws. Rules of privacy already allow the state to limit the freedom. Enhanced with digital systems, like asking for digital surveillance. What are limits, etc. | ||
+ | |||
+ | 2. Starts from the bottom up, difficult to conceptualise. Not part of standard public health surveillance. If imagine new ecosystem of contributors, not to enhance surveillance. Should they need a framework for themselves beyond the laws. | ||
+ | What's is the driver?<br> | ||
+ | what's are the limits?<br> | ||
+ | Should we need a framework?<br> | ||
'''Start with anthropology'''<br> | '''Start with anthropology'''<br> | ||
Line 51: | Line 58: | ||
* unemployed person healed from COVID-19 | * unemployed person healed from COVID-19 | ||
* isolated elder person | * isolated elder person | ||
− | * family with home-school | + | * family with home-school |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− |
Revision as of 11:42, 28 March 2020
return to the main page of the HackCovid
data anthropology
Presentation
General questions useful for the hackathon:
From the perspective of medical anthropology, intersectionality:
Target an Application that creates a social profile to be utilized to facilitate social interaction minimizing socioeconomic damage during pandemics (sadly they are here to stay) and unlike SARS1 that ground pockets of economy to a halt, SARS2 has ground the global economy to a halt.
• A central tenet – there is no biomedical (vaccine, antiretroviral) response to COVID19
• As with SARS1, MERS etc, medical treatments are possible, but unlikely
• This is key, our response is a social response (physical distancing, shelter in place) limiting social interaction
• End result is to break the chain of transmission of COVID19 utilizing app that contains a social profile to identify safe interactions
• Allow privacy but health identifiers
• Are the app connections both gouvernment and society-based?
• What is the main target function of the app?
• Data sets and maths to create?
• Critical not to infringe on rights in the West
• Asian approach of lock down can’t be used in the West
• Foucault’s biopower in play, the peoples power and rights fed back up to the government
• The app navigates this contour of human rights versus government control
• Surveys to get profiles? What is the value/danger of profiling?
• How does the app contribute to the social response to COVID19, since that is our only response?
Discussion
1. Started by public health surveillance, and their ethics and laws. Rules of privacy already allow the state to limit the freedom. Enhanced with digital systems, like asking for digital surveillance. What are limits, etc.
2. Starts from the bottom up, difficult to conceptualise. Not part of standard public health surveillance. If imagine new ecosystem of contributors, not to enhance surveillance. Should they need a framework for themselves beyond the laws.
What's is the driver?
what's are the limits?
Should we need a framework?
Start with anthropology
whats' the model
resources
how many models?
identify how people are living? How exposed they're?
social points of contagion
what's the implication for ethics?
11 types of at risk profiles were detected
444 answers from the French version of Questionnaire COVID-19 lifestyles and contagion
Very interesting input specially the supermarket visit .
Personas for design: https://docs.google.com/document/d/16-B-CN652Wm8qeEUB2OATsQwL6JEr6xF1rHPyeHPduE/edit?usp=sharing
11 types of at risk profiles were detected
- kid + single parents
- teenager + student
- single person without children with office job (homeworking)
- doctor in hospital (borderer worker)
- nurse in mobility
- delivery person
- cashier or seller in a supermarket + risky partner
- independent worker
- unemployed person healed from COVID-19
- isolated elder person
- family with home-school