Difference between revisions of "Own Analysis of SwissCovid (Q4773)"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created claim: date (P100): 15 June 2020) |
(Created claim: quote (P203): We conclude that there is no founded technical justification for excluding GAEN from the components of the system. We strongly believe that the ordinance is a legal trick to bypass the law which is the consequence of a disagreement between SwissCovid and Apple-Google. We urge constitutional experts to make an assessment on the validity of the ordinance.) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Property / concerns | |||
| + | |||
| Property / concerns: Google/Apple contact tracing protocol / rank | |||
| + | Normal rank | ||
| Property / quote | |||
| + | We conclude that there is no founded technical justification for excluding GAEN from the components of the system. We strongly believe that the ordinance is a legal trick to bypass the law which is the consequence of a disagreement between SwissCovid and Apple-Google. We urge constitutional experts to make an assessment on the validity of the ordinance. | ||
| Property / quote: We conclude that there is no founded technical justification for excluding GAEN from the components of the system. We strongly believe that the ordinance is a legal trick to bypass the law which is the consequence of a disagreement between SwissCovid and Apple-Google. We urge constitutional experts to make an assessment on the validity of the ordinance. / rank | |||
| + | Normal rank | ||
Latest revision as of 20:18, 19 June 2020
blog post published on June, 2020
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English |
Own Analysis of SwissCovid
|
blog post published on June, 2020
|
Statements
15 June 2020
0 references
We conclude that there is no founded technical justification for excluding GAEN from the components of the system. We strongly believe that the ordinance is a legal trick to bypass the law which is the consequence of a disagreement between SwissCovid and Apple-Google. We urge constitutional experts to make an assessment on the validity of the ordinance.
0 references