Difference between revisions of "Replays attacks (SwissCovid) (Q4760)"

From Wikibase Personal data
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(‎Created claim: concerns (P110): SwissCovid (Q4518))
(‎Changed [en] description: MELANI's Report published on June 2020)
 
(5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
description / endescription / en
-
Report published by Melani on June 2020
+
MELANI's Report published on June 2020
Property / concerns
 +
Property / concerns: Contact tracing / rank
 +
Normal rank
Property / date
 +
14 June 2020
Timestamp+2020-06-14T00:00:00Z
Timezone+00:00
CalendarGregorian
Precision1 day
Before0
After0
Property / date: 14 June 2020 / rank
 +
Normal rank
Property / country
 +
Property / country: Switzerland / rank
 +
Normal rank
Property / quote
 +
It is better to turn it off at home, which reduces the replay attack risk on the receiving side, when in places that should later not be exposed, or when at work if a risk of BLE collectors operated by the employer exists. Using the app is not a binary decision, but can be adapted by users depending of their current environment.
Property / quote: It is better to turn it off at home, which reduces the replay attack risk on the receiving side, when in places that should later not be exposed, or when at work if a risk of BLE collectors operated by the employer exists. Using the app is not a binary decision, but can be adapted by users depending of their current environment. / rank
 +
Normal rank
Property / quote
 +
While such an attack is possible, it is associated with high costs for the attackers. As such, we believe that the benefit of the app is higher than the potential risk of such an attack." [..] We believe that the most important thing to do is to accept that there are residual risks and to perceive the app as just one additional data source for the handling of the pandemic.
Property / quote: While such an attack is possible, it is associated with high costs for the attackers. As such, we believe that the benefit of the app is higher than the potential risk of such an attack." [..] We believe that the most important thing to do is to accept that there are residual risks and to perceive the app as just one additional data source for the handling of the pandemic. / rank
 +
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 20:18, 19 June 2020

Statements

0 references
0 references
0 references
0 references
14 June 2020
0 references
0 references
It is better to turn it off at home, which reduces the replay attack risk on the receiving side, when in places that should later not be exposed, or when at work if a risk of BLE collectors operated by the employer exists. Using the app is not a binary decision, but can be adapted by users depending of their current environment.
0 references
While such an attack is possible, it is associated with high costs for the attackers. As such, we believe that the benefit of the app is higher than the potential risk of such an attack." [..] We believe that the most important thing to do is to accept that there are residual risks and to perceive the app as just one additional data source for the handling of the pandemic.
0 references