Difference between revisions of "Critical Limitations of Digital Epidemiology (Q4748)"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created a new Item: #quickstatements; #temporary_batch_1591876931879) |
(Created claim: date (P100): June 2020) |
||||||||||||||
(6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||||||||||||||
Property / concerns | |||||||||||||||
+ | |||||||||||||||
Property / concerns: Coronadata / rank | |||||||||||||||
+ | Normal rank | ||||||||||||||
Property / concerns | |||||||||||||||
+ | |||||||||||||||
Property / concerns: contact tracing application / rank | |||||||||||||||
+ | Normal rank | ||||||||||||||
Property / concerns | |||||||||||||||
+ | |||||||||||||||
Property / concerns: Contact tracing / rank | |||||||||||||||
+ | Normal rank | ||||||||||||||
Property / quote | |||||||||||||||
+ | From a statistical and methodological perspective, the use of smart devices suffers from under-coverage and non response, which are rarely addressed by proponents of digital epidemiology. [..]. For COVID-19 surveillance, we recommend that instead of digital epidemiology, available routine data and random samples should be used | ||||||||||||||
Property / quote: From a statistical and methodological perspective, the use of smart devices suffers from under-coverage and non response, which are rarely addressed by proponents of digital epidemiology. [..]. For COVID-19 surveillance, we recommend that instead of digital epidemiology, available routine data and random samples should be used / rank | |||||||||||||||
+ | Normal rank | ||||||||||||||
Property / quote | |||||||||||||||
+ | The main methodological problem is the selection process described. The sample of the population actually using the app will not be a random sample. It seems likely that especially subpopulations with a higher prevalence of undetected infections will have lower coverage rates by the apps: | ||||||||||||||
Property / quote: The main methodological problem is the selection process described. The sample of the population actually using the app will not be a random sample. It seems likely that especially subpopulations with a higher prevalence of undetected infections will have lower coverage rates by the apps: / rank | |||||||||||||||
+ | Normal rank | ||||||||||||||
Property / quote | |||||||||||||||
+ | Older people, children, persons without smartphones due to lower-income and members of vulnerable populations. | ||||||||||||||
Property / quote: Older people, children, persons without smartphones due to lower-income and members of vulnerable populations. / rank | |||||||||||||||
+ | Normal rank | ||||||||||||||
Property / date | |||||||||||||||
+ | June 2020
| ||||||||||||||
Property / date: June 2020 / rank | |||||||||||||||
+ | Normal rank |
Latest revision as of 23:45, 10 February 2021
journal article from 'Survey Research Methods' published in 2020
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English |
Critical Limitations of Digital Epidemiology
|
journal article from 'Survey Research Methods' published in 2020
|
Statements
From a statistical and methodological perspective, the use of smart devices suffers from under-coverage and non response, which are rarely addressed by proponents of digital epidemiology. [..]. For COVID-19 surveillance, we recommend that instead of digital epidemiology, available routine data and random samples should be used
0 references
The main methodological problem is the selection process described. The sample of the population actually using the app will not be a random sample. It seems likely that especially subpopulations with a higher prevalence of undetected infections will have lower coverage rates by the apps:
0 references
Older people, children, persons without smartphones due to lower-income and members of vulnerable populations.
0 references
June 2020
0 references