Difference between revisions of "Automated contact tracing is not a coronavirus panacea (Q4465)"

From Wikibase Personal data
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(‎Created claim: concerns (P110): Coronadata (Q4138))
(‎Created claim: official website (P15): https://blog.gds-gov.tech/automated-contact-tracing-is-not-a-coronavirus-panacea-57fb3ce61d98)
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Property / concerns
 +
Property / concerns: Contact tracing / rank
 +
Normal rank
Property / concerns
 +
Property / concerns: TraceTogether / rank
 +
Normal rank
Property / date
 +
11 April 2020
Timestamp+2020-04-11T00:00:00Z
Timezone+00:00
CalendarGregorian
Precision1 day
Before0
After0
Property / date: 11 April 2020 / rank
 +
Normal rank
Property / quote
 +
An automated algorithm will necessarily generate both false negatives and false positives. A human contact tracer will similarly make mistakes. However, because a human contact tracer would seek to incorporate information beyond just physical proximity, he/she can correct for systematic biases introduced by automated notification system.
Property / quote: An automated algorithm will necessarily generate both false negatives and false positives. A human contact tracer will similarly make mistakes. However, because a human contact tracer would seek to incorporate information beyond just physical proximity, he/she can correct for systematic biases introduced by automated notification system. / rank
 +
Normal rank
Property / official website
 +
Property / official website: https://blog.gds-gov.tech/automated-contact-tracing-is-not-a-coronavirus-panacea-57fb3ce61d98 / rank
 +
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 17:59, 14 April 2020

blogpost published by Jason Bay, product lead for TraceTogether
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Automated contact tracing is not a coronavirus panacea
blogpost published by Jason Bay, product lead for TraceTogether

    Statements

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    11 April 2020
    0 references
    An automated algorithm will necessarily generate both false negatives and false positives. A human contact tracer will similarly make mistakes. However, because a human contact tracer would seek to incorporate information beyond just physical proximity, he/she can correct for systematic biases introduced by automated notification system.
    0 references