Difference between revisions of "Own Analysis of SwissCovid (Q4773)"

From Wikibase Personal data
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(‎Created claim: date (P100): 15 June 2020)
(‎Created claim: quote (P203): We conclude that there is no founded technical justification for excluding GAEN from the components of the system. We strongly believe that the ordinance is a legal trick to bypass the law which is the consequence of a disagreement between SwissCovid and Apple-Google. We urge constitutional experts to make an assessment on the validity of the ordinance.)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Property / concerns
 +
Property / concerns: Google/Apple contact tracing protocol / rank
 +
Normal rank
Property / quote
 +
We conclude that there is no founded technical justification for excluding GAEN from the components of the system. We strongly believe that the ordinance is a legal trick to bypass the law which is the consequence of a disagreement between SwissCovid and Apple-Google. We urge constitutional experts to make an assessment on the validity of the ordinance.
Property / quote: We conclude that there is no founded technical justification for excluding GAEN from the components of the system. We strongly believe that the ordinance is a legal trick to bypass the law which is the consequence of a disagreement between SwissCovid and Apple-Google. We urge constitutional experts to make an assessment on the validity of the ordinance. / rank
 +
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 20:18, 19 June 2020

blog post published on June, 2020
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Own Analysis of SwissCovid
blog post published on June, 2020

    Statements

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    15 June 2020
    0 references
    We conclude that there is no founded technical justification for excluding GAEN from the components of the system. We strongly believe that the ordinance is a legal trick to bypass the law which is the consequence of a disagreement between SwissCovid and Apple-Google. We urge constitutional experts to make an assessment on the validity of the ordinance.
    0 references