Difference between revisions of "The Institutionalisation of Digital Public Health: Lessons Learned from the COVID-19 App (Q4665)"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created claim: date (P100): May 2020) |
(Created claim: quote (P203): It should first be observed that the introduction of a mobile phone app as a solution to implementing an effective form of contact tracing has been marred by incorrect assumptions and false dichotomies, the first and foremost being the one that accepts that there is a trade-off between the need to respect privacy/data protection and public health.) |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Property / official website | Property / official website | ||
- | + | ||
Property / quote | |||
+ | It should first be observed that the introduction of a mobile phone app as a solution to implementing an effective form of contact tracing has been marred by incorrect assumptions and false dichotomies, the first and foremost being the one that accepts that there is a trade-off between the need to respect privacy/data protection and public health. | ||
Property / quote: It should first be observed that the introduction of a mobile phone app as a solution to implementing an effective form of contact tracing has been marred by incorrect assumptions and false dichotomies, the first and foremost being the one that accepts that there is a trade-off between the need to respect privacy/data protection and public health. / rank | |||
+ | Normal rank |
Latest revision as of 20:51, 24 May 2020
journal article from 'European Journal of Risk Regulation' published in May 2020
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English |
The Institutionalisation of Digital Public Health: Lessons Learned from the COVID-19 App
|
journal article from 'European Journal of Risk Regulation' published in May 2020
|
Statements
May 2020
0 references
It should first be observed that the introduction of a mobile phone app as a solution to implementing an effective form of contact tracing has been marred by incorrect assumptions and false dichotomies, the first and foremost being the one that accepts that there is a trade-off between the need to respect privacy/data protection and public health.
0 references