Difference between revisions of "Bluetooth vs Ultra-Wideband: which indoor location system? (Q4610)"

From Wikibase Personal data
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(‎Created claim: official website (P15): https://blog.pointr.tech/bluetooth-vs-ultra-wideband-which-technology-to-use-for-indoor-location)
(‎Created claim: quote (P203): Even though Ultra-Wideband seems superior to Bluetooth positioning, there is no UWB infrastructure in place today. It requires antennas to be installed in the corners of the venue before indoor positioning with UWB can be enabled.)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Property / concerns
 +
Property / concerns: Bluetooth Low Energy / rank
 +
Normal rank
Property / concerns
 +
Property / concerns: Ultra-wideband / rank
 +
Normal rank
Property / date
 +
March 2020
Timestamp+2020-03-00T00:00:00Z
Timezone+00:00
CalendarGregorian
Precision1 month
Before0
After0
Property / date: March 2020 / rank
 +
Normal rank
Property / quote
 +
Even though Ultra-Wideband seems superior to Bluetooth positioning, there is no UWB infrastructure in place today. It requires antennas to be installed in the corners of the venue before indoor positioning with UWB can be enabled.
Property / quote: Even though Ultra-Wideband seems superior to Bluetooth positioning, there is no UWB infrastructure in place today. It requires antennas to be installed in the corners of the venue before indoor positioning with UWB can be enabled. / rank
 +
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 21:47, 14 May 2020

report published in March 2020
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Bluetooth vs Ultra-Wideband: which indoor location system?
report published in March 2020

    Statements

    0 references
    0 references
    March 2020
    0 references
    Even though Ultra-Wideband seems superior to Bluetooth positioning, there is no UWB infrastructure in place today. It requires antennas to be installed in the corners of the venue before indoor positioning with UWB can be enabled.
    0 references