Difference between revisions of "Analysis of DP3T: Between Scylla and Charybdis (Q4461)"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created claim: date (P100): 4 April 2020) |
(Created claim: concerns (P110): Contact tracing (Q4209)) |
||
(5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
description / en | description / en | ||
- | + | scholarly article published on April 8, 2020 | |
Property / concerns | |||
+ | |||
Property / concerns: Coronadata / rank | |||
+ | Normal rank | ||
Property / concerns | |||
+ | |||
Property / concerns: Decentralized Privacy-Preserving Proximity Tracing / rank | |||
+ | Normal rank | ||
Property / concerns | |||
+ | |||
Property / concerns: Contact tracing / rank | |||
+ | Normal rank | ||
Property / official website | |||
+ | |||
Property / official website: https://eprint.iacr.org/2020/399.pdf / rank | |||
+ | Normal rank | ||
Property / quote | |||
+ | It's surprising that decentralization creates more privacy threats than it solves.Indeed, sick people who are anonymously reported can be deanonymized, private encountered can be uncovered, and people may be coerced to reveal their private data. Keeping Bluetooth would always reveal the presence of a device but could not create any more threat if used with great care. | ||
Property / quote: It's surprising that decentralization creates more privacy threats than it solves.Indeed, sick people who are anonymously reported can be deanonymized, private encountered can be uncovered, and people may be coerced to reveal their private data. Keeping Bluetooth would always reveal the presence of a device but could not create any more threat if used with great care. / rank | |||
+ | Normal rank |
Latest revision as of 09:29, 15 April 2020
scholarly article published on April 8, 2020
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English |
Analysis of DP3T: Between Scylla and Charybdis
|
scholarly article published on April 8, 2020
|
Statements
4 April 2020
0 references
It's surprising that decentralization creates more privacy threats than it solves.Indeed, sick people who are anonymously reported can be deanonymized, private encountered can be uncovered, and people may be coerced to reveal their private data. Keeping Bluetooth would always reveal the presence of a device but could not create any more threat if used with great care.
0 references