Difference between revisions of "Analysis of DP3T: Between Scylla and Charybdis (Q4461)"

From Wikibase Personal data
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
description / endescription / en
-
scholarly article published on Aoril 8, 2020
+
scholarly article published on April 8, 2020
Property / date
 +
4 April 2020
Timestamp+2020-04-04T00:00:00Z
Timezone+00:00
CalendarGregorian
Precision1 day
Before0
After0
Property / date: 4 April 2020 / rank
 +
Normal rank
Property / concerns
 +
Property / concerns: Coronadata / rank
 +
Normal rank
Property / concerns
 +
Property / concerns: Decentralized Privacy-Preserving Proximity Tracing / rank
 +
Normal rank
Property / concerns
 +
Property / concerns: Contact tracing / rank
 +
Normal rank
Property / official website
 +
Property / official website: https://eprint.iacr.org/2020/399.pdf / rank
 +
Normal rank
Property / quote
 +
It's surprising that decentralization creates more privacy threats than it solves.Indeed, sick people who are anonymously reported can be deanonymized, private encountered can be uncovered, and people may be coerced to reveal their private data. Keeping Bluetooth would always reveal the presence of a device but could not create any more threat if used with great care.
Property / quote: It's surprising that decentralization creates more privacy threats than it solves.Indeed, sick people who are anonymously reported can be deanonymized, private encountered can be uncovered, and people may be coerced to reveal their private data. Keeping Bluetooth would always reveal the presence of a device but could not create any more threat if used with great care. / rank
 +
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 09:29, 15 April 2020

scholarly article published on April 8, 2020
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Analysis of DP3T: Between Scylla and Charybdis
scholarly article published on April 8, 2020

    Statements

    4 April 2020
    0 references
    It's surprising that decentralization creates more privacy threats than it solves.Indeed, sick people who are anonymously reported can be deanonymized, private encountered can be uncovered, and people may be coerced to reveal their private data. Keeping Bluetooth would always reveal the presence of a device but could not create any more threat if used with great care.
    0 references