Difference between revisions of "Automated contact tracing is not a coronavirus panacea (Q4465)"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created claim: quote (P203): An automated algorithm will necessarily generate both false negatives and false positives. A human contact tracer will similarly make mistakes. However, because a human contact tracer would seek to incorporate information beyond just physical proximity, he/she can correct for systematic biases introduced by automated notification system.) |
(Created claim: official website (P15): https://blog.gds-gov.tech/automated-contact-tracing-is-not-a-coronavirus-panacea-57fb3ce61d98) |
||
| Property / official website | |||
| + | |||
| Property / official website: https://blog.gds-gov.tech/automated-contact-tracing-is-not-a-coronavirus-panacea-57fb3ce61d98 / rank | |||
| + | Normal rank | ||
Latest revision as of 17:59, 14 April 2020
blogpost published by Jason Bay, product lead for TraceTogether
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English |
Automated contact tracing is not a coronavirus panacea
|
blogpost published by Jason Bay, product lead for TraceTogether
|
Statements
11 April 2020
0 references
An automated algorithm will necessarily generate both false negatives and false positives. A human contact tracer will similarly make mistakes. However, because a human contact tracer would seek to incorporate information beyond just physical proximity, he/she can correct for systematic biases introduced by automated notification system.
0 references