Difference between revisions of "Events/HackCovid/2020-03-28/Group3"
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
===Discussion=== | ===Discussion=== | ||
| − | '''Start with anthropology''' | + | '''Start with anthropology'''<br> |
| + | |||
whats' the model | whats' the model | ||
resources | resources | ||
| Line 34: | Line 35: | ||
2. Starts from the bottom up, difficult to conceptualise. Not part of standard public health surveillance. If imagine new ecosystem of contributors, not to enhance surveillance. Should they need a framework for themselves beyond the laws. | 2. Starts from the bottom up, difficult to conceptualise. Not part of standard public health surveillance. If imagine new ecosystem of contributors, not to enhance surveillance. Should they need a framework for themselves beyond the laws. | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
What's is the driver?<br> | What's is the driver?<br> | ||
what's are the limits?<br> | what's are the limits?<br> | ||
Should we need a framework?<br> | Should we need a framework?<br> | ||
Revision as of 10:52, 28 March 2020
return to the main page of the HackCovid
data anthropology
Presentation
General questions useful for the hackathon:
From the perspective of medical anthropology, intersectionality:
Target an Application that creates a social profile to be utilized to facilitate social interaction minimizing socioeconomic damage during pandemics (sadly they are here to stay) and unlike SARS1 that ground pockets of economy to a halt, SARS2 has ground the global economy to a halt.
• A central tenet – there is no biomedical (vaccine, antiretroviral) response to COVID19
• As with SARS1, MERS etc, medical treatments are possible, but unlikely
• This is key, our response is a social response (physical distancing, shelter in place) limiting social interaction
• End result is to break the chain of transmission of COVID19 utilizing app that contains a social profile to identify safe interactions
• Allow privacy but health identifiers
• Are the app connections both gouvernment and society-based?
• What is the main target function of the app?
• Data sets and maths to create?
• Critical not to infringe on rights in the West
• Asian approach of lock down can’t be used in the West
• Foucault’s biopower in play, the peoples power and rights fed back up to the government
• The app navigates this contour of human rights versus government control
• Surveys to get profiles? What is the value/danger of profiling?
• How does the app contribute to the social response to COVID19, since that is our only response?
Discussion
Start with anthropology
whats' the model resources how many models?
1. Started by public health surveillance, and their ethics and laws. Rules of privacy already allow the state to limit the freedom. Enhanced with digital systems, like asking for digital surveillance. What are limits, etc.
2. Starts from the bottom up, difficult to conceptualise. Not part of standard public health surveillance. If imagine new ecosystem of contributors, not to enhance surveillance. Should they need a framework for themselves beyond the laws.
What's is the driver?
what's are the limits?
Should we need a framework?