Revision history of "Bluetooth vs Ultra-Wideband: which indoor location system?" (Q4610)

Diff selection: Mark the radio boxes of the revisions to compare and hit enter or the button at the bottom.
Legend: (cur) = difference with latest revision, (prev) = difference with preceding revision, m = minor edit.

curprev 21:47, 14 May 2020‎ Genferei talk contribs‎ 2,698 bytes +567‎ ‎Created claim: quote (P203): Even though Ultra-Wideband seems superior to Bluetooth positioning, there is no UWB infrastructure in place today. It requires antennas to be installed in the corners of the venue before indoor positioning with UWB can be enabled.
curprev 21:46, 14 May 2020‎ Genferei talk contribs‎ 2,131 bytes +513‎ ‎Created claim: date (P100): March 2020
curprev 21:45, 14 May 2020‎ Genferei talk contribs‎ 1,618 bytes +405‎ ‎Created claim: concerns (P110): Ultra-wideband (Q4546)
curprev 21:45, 14 May 2020‎ Genferei talk contribs‎ 1,213 bytes +422‎ ‎Created claim: concerns (P110): Bluetooth Low Energy (Q4406)
curprev 21:45, 14 May 2020‎ Genferei talk contribs‎ 791 bytes +430‎ ‎Created claim: official website (P15): https://blog.pointr.tech/bluetooth-vs-ultra-wideband-which-technology-to-use-for-indoor-location
curprev 21:44, 14 May 2020‎ Genferei talk contribs‎ 361 bytes +361‎ ‎Created a new Item: Bluetooth vs Ultra-Wideband: which indoor location system?, report published in March 2020

Revision history of "Bluetooth vs Ultra-Wideband: which indoor location system?" (Q4610)

Navigation menu

Search