Difference between revisions of "Events/HackCovid/2020-03-28"

From Wikibase Personal data
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 16: Line 16:
  
 
==Work Plan==
 
==Work Plan==
Everybody can contribute by editing the document or leaving comments.
 
 
We expect to collect in particular: topics of interest to create groups of work, group leaders, specific objectives in relation to the general statement, outputs you wish to achieve by the end of the event, collaborative tools.
 
  
 
== Schedule ==  
 
== Schedule ==  

Revision as of 18:34, 27 March 2020

HackCovid-Leman
date: 28 March 2020
where: ONLINE --> https://tinyurl.com/hackcovid Zoom:957 309 096 from 10AM to 5PM

Questionnaire COVID-19 lifestyles and contagion

Please take the time to answer this questionnaire it will help working on the results during the hackathon:

English https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSf7KUF_Bh96PePlN-77a4KiSnxkUdpjHzjKyD1t3__B0FJn6A/viewform?usp=pp_url

French https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSfhhVpiJjg1S_g3ahqpUQvtjx14nm9603Dxa0uckfAX9vyfqw/viewform?usp=pp_url

Spanish https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSc-S9PuJyBLsBipvZdqeVBKC6rH-MdxGWbfUqO1tEkfaXhUiA/viewform?usp=pp_url


Work Plan

Schedule

1.Introduction by Paul-Olivier Dehaye

  • MyData update and governance, why national tracing (PO)

2.SHORT TALKS

  • biological aspect: understanding the virus
  • sociological aspect: explain the context population, authorities, public health, why work on this? how to count those who do not have voices without data? seek data minimization, what is the social meaning of monitoring, on what scale? (Miles and Jessica)
  • technical aspect: understanding transparency in existing solutions (Lennig) legality in relation to proportionality (PO) global vs. local context, how to prove that tracing is necessary?
  • our initiative stemming from MyData (PO): trusted intermediaries, informed consent

3. Presentation of groups so everyone can make a choice where to participate.

  • comments, questions, new ideas

4. Group formation in Zoom according to the number of group 1-6



Working groups


Group 1: Legal informed consent data protection
privacy
impact assessment
data subjects rights to ensure
clarify analysis that will be conducted with personal data
risks minimization
balancing tests

Group 2: data collection
crowdsourcing what data to collect
how much to collect
what is useful in respect to questions we want to answer
from which sources, databases
data storage
data protection
tools, scripts for automatic collection
see: Crowdsourced data collection: what to get?

Group 3: data anthropology
state of the art: epidemiology, social sciences, data science
how are communities, and social networks built
qualitative study. Survey users about routines in house, mobility, shopping, social contacts, children and family care
build personas
research agenda
relation with public health
relation with crowdsourcing
what are the solutions for people without internet, devices, that do not want to track? what are the benefits of those type of persons for the whole community in terms of privacy, infrastructure costs...?

Group 4: tech savvy
apps security infrastructure

Group 5: ethics
merge with data anthropology?

Group 6: data Viz

Participants

add your name
Palrogg
Pidoux
Podehaye
Genferei
...

Hack code of conduit

Our hackathon is dedicated to providing a safe and comfortable environment and harassment-free experience for everyone. We do not tolerate harassment of hackathon participants in any form. Hackathon participants violating these rules may be sanctioned or expelled from the hackathon at the discretion of the hackathon organisers.

Resources

mydataglobal.slack.com/ #coronadata #coronavalues #coronaneeds #coronainfo