Item:Q2401 - Revision history

Podehaye: /* wbsetclaim-create:2||1 */ Property:P126: Governing algorithmic decision-making is hard. [] in significant part, solving the governance problem is hard because we cannot agree on why to regulate. A growing literature now focuses on regulating alg...

2019-12-09T13:01:24Z

‎Created claim: comment (P126): Governing algorithmic decision-making is hard. [] in significant part, solving the governance problem is hard because we cannot agree on why to regulate. A growing literature now focuses on regulating alg...

Podehaye: /* wbsetclaim-create:2||1 */ Property:P126: If aggregated by third parties—the media or civil society—individual stories can trigger soft accountability mechanisms, like market responses or naming-and-shaming. The question is whether the indivi...

2019-12-09T12:56:31Z

‎Created claim: comment (P126): If aggregated by third parties—the media or civil society—individual stories can trigger soft accountability mechanisms, like market responses or naming-and-shaming. The question is whether the indivi...

Podehaye: /* wbsetclaim-create:2||1 */ Property:P126: because the GDPR relies on collaborative governance, its attempts at individual transparency must serve a dual role. Absent policy changes, the GDPR’s individual transparency provisions will need to ser...

2019-12-09T12:53:14Z

‎Created claim: comment (P126): because the GDPR relies on collaborative governance, its attempts at individual transparency must serve a dual role. Absent policy changes, the GDPR’s individual transparency provisions will need to ser...

Podehaye: /* wbsetclaim-create:2||1 */ Property:P126: To accomplish meaningful oversight, both NGOs and the press will need to link individual disclosures into politically effective group narratives, revealing what is going on over an algorithmic decision-ma...

2019-12-09T12:52:35Z

‎Created claim: comment (P126): To accomplish meaningful oversight, both NGOs and the press will need to link individual disclosures into politically effective group narratives, revealing what is going on over an algorithmic decision-ma...

Podehaye: /* wbsetclaim-update:2||1 */ Property:P126: [high-quality collaborative governance in the absence of true public transparency] will depend on the ability of NGOs and other policy advocates to harness the GDPR’s system of individual transparency r...

2019-12-09T12:52:17Z

‎Changed claim: comment (P126): [high-quality collaborative governance in the absence of true public transparency] will depend on the ability of NGOs and other policy advocates to harness the GDPR’s system of individual transparency r...

Podehaye: /* wbsetclaim-create:2||1 */ Property:P126: It will depend on the ability of NGOs and other policy advocates to harness the GDPR’s system of individual transparency rights coupled possibly with freedom of information laws to obtain both enforceme...

2019-12-09T12:52:00Z

‎Created claim: comment (P126): It will depend on the ability of NGOs and other policy advocates to harness the GDPR’s system of individual transparency rights coupled possibly with freedom of information laws to obtain both enforceme...

Podehaye: /* wbsetclaim-create:2||1 */ Property:P126: It is possible that despite the GDPR’s lack of public transparency and input by third parties, impact assessments and maybe draft codes of conduct will be made available to the public through other mean...

2019-12-09T12:51:08Z

‎Created claim: comment (P126): It is possible that despite the GDPR’s lack of public transparency and input by third parties, impact assessments and maybe draft codes of conduct will be made available to the public through other mean...

Podehaye: /* wbsetclaim-create:2||1 */ Property:P126: An impact assessment, in other words, is supposed to be a tripartite conversation between a regulated entity, the regulator, and third parties such as impacted persons or civil society organizations. In t...

2019-12-09T12:50:32Z

‎Created claim: comment (P126): An impact assessment, in other words, is supposed to be a tripartite conversation between a regulated entity, the regulator, and third parties such as impacted persons or civil society organizations. In t...

Podehaye: /* wbsetclaim-create:2||1 */ Property:P126: The GDPR for the most part envisions collaboration as taking place between regulators and regulated private parties, to the exclusion of third parties, such as civil society or external experts. This thre...

2019-12-09T12:41:23Z

‎Created claim: comment (P126): The GDPR for the most part envisions collaboration as taking place between regulators and regulated private parties, to the exclusion of third parties, such as civil society or external experts. This thre...

Podehaye: /* wbsetclaim-create:2||1 */ Property:P126: Intriguingly the GDPR’s absence of public-facing and stakeholder-facing accountability suggests that individual transparency rights may have to serve a crucial accountability role in its system of colla...

2019-12-09T12:12:01Z

‎Created claim: comment (P126): Intriguingly the GDPR’s absence of public-facing and stakeholder-facing accountability suggests that individual transparency rights may have to serve a crucial accountability role in its system of colla...

← Older revision	Revision as of 13:01, 9 December 2019
	Property / comment
	+	Governing algorithmic decision-making is hard. [] in significant part, solving the governance problem is hard because we cannot agree on why to regulate. A growing literature now focuses on regulating algorithmic decision-making in order to solve problems such as error, bias, and discrimination, but ignores or brushes over legitimate dignitary and justificatory reasons for regulating.
	Property / comment: Governing algorithmic decision-making is hard. [] in significant part, solving the governance problem is hard because we cannot agree on why to regulate. A growing literature now focuses on regulating algorithmic decision-making in order to solve problems such as error, bias, and discrimination, but ignores or brushes over legitimate dignitary and justificatory reasons for regulating. / rank
	+	Normal rank

← Older revision	Revision as of 12:56, 9 December 2019
	Property / comment
	+	If aggregated by third parties—the media or civil society—individual stories can trigger soft accountability mechanisms, like market responses or naming-and-shaming. The question is whether the individual transparency produced in the GDPR’s individual rights vindication provisions will be adequate to serve those functions in its collaborative governance regime.
	Property / comment: If aggregated by third parties—the media or civil society—individual stories can trigger soft accountability mechanisms, like market responses or naming-and-shaming. The question is whether the individual transparency produced in the GDPR’s individual rights vindication provisions will be adequate to serve those functions in its collaborative governance regime. / rank
	+	Normal rank

← Older revision	Revision as of 12:53, 9 December 2019
	Property / comment
	+	because the GDPR relies on collaborative governance, its attempts at individual transparency must serve a dual role. Absent policy changes, the GDPR’s individual transparency provisions will need to serve both individual dignitary and justificatory ends and as a crucial element of structured accountability in its collaborative governance regime.
	Property / comment: because the GDPR relies on collaborative governance, its attempts at individual transparency must serve a dual role. Absent policy changes, the GDPR’s individual transparency provisions will need to serve both individual dignitary and justificatory ends and as a crucial element of structured accountability in its collaborative governance regime. / rank
	+	Normal rank

← Older revision	Revision as of 12:52, 9 December 2019
	Property / comment
	+	To accomplish meaningful oversight, both NGOs and the press will need to link individual disclosures into politically effective group narratives, revealing what is going on over an algorithmic decision-making system as a whole. This will be costly and time- consuming and will involve much coordination. Still, it may be possible over time.
	Property / comment: To accomplish meaningful oversight, both NGOs and the press will need to link individual disclosures into politically effective group narratives, revealing what is going on over an algorithmic decision-making system as a whole. This will be costly and time- consuming and will involve much coordination. Still, it may be possible over time. / rank
	+	Normal rank

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:52, 9 December 2019
Property / comment		Property / comment
-	It will depend on the ability of NGOs and other policy advocates to harness the GDPR’s system of individual transparency rights coupled possibly with freedom of information laws to obtain both enforcement and transparency.	+	[high-quality collaborative governance in the absence of true public transparency] will depend on the ability of NGOs and other policy advocates to harness the GDPR’s system of individual transparency rights coupled possibly with freedom of information laws to obtain both enforcement and transparency.

← Older revision	Revision as of 12:51, 9 December 2019
	Property / comment
	+	It is possible that despite the GDPR’s lack of public transparency and input by third parties, impact assessments and maybe draft codes of conduct will be made available to the public through other means. Freedom of information law might be used to obtain public disclosure.
	Property / comment: It is possible that despite the GDPR’s lack of public transparency and input by third parties, impact assessments and maybe draft codes of conduct will be made available to the public through other means. Freedom of information law might be used to obtain public disclosure. / rank
	+	Normal rank

← Older revision	Revision as of 12:50, 9 December 2019
	Property / comment
	+	An impact assessment, in other words, is supposed to be a tripartite conversation between a regulated entity, the regulator, and third parties such as impacted persons or civil society organizations. In the GDPR, it is largely used internally or, at most, in conversation with regulators.
	Property / comment: An impact assessment, in other words, is supposed to be a tripartite conversation between a regulated entity, the regulator, and third parties such as impacted persons or civil society organizations. In the GDPR, it is largely used internally or, at most, in conversation with regulators. / rank
	+	Normal rank

← Older revision	Revision as of 12:41, 9 December 2019
	Property / comment
	+	The GDPR for the most part envisions collaboration as taking place between regulators and regulated private parties, to the exclusion of third parties, such as civil society or external experts. This threatens both the substance and legitimacy of the regime. To some extent, this design flaw may reflect the relative weakness of civil society in the EU.
	Property / comment: The GDPR for the most part envisions collaboration as taking place between regulators and regulated private parties, to the exclusion of third parties, such as civil society or external experts. This threatens both the substance and legitimacy of the regime. To some extent, this design flaw may reflect the relative weakness of civil society in the EU. / rank
	+	Normal rank

← Older revision	Revision as of 12:12, 9 December 2019
	Property / comment
	+	Intriguingly the GDPR’s absence of public-facing and stakeholder-facing accountability suggests that individual transparency rights may have to serve a crucial accountability role in its system of collaborative governance. Thus, even for those focused on instrumental [] goals, individual rights in the GDPR may be necessary for producing effective systemic regulation, too
	Property / comment: Intriguingly the GDPR’s absence of public-facing and stakeholder-facing accountability suggests that individual transparency rights may have to serve a crucial accountability role in its system of collaborative governance. Thus, even for those focused on instrumental [] goals, individual rights in the GDPR may be necessary for producing effective systemic regulation, too / rank
	+	Normal rank